Can free AI videos be used to make money? It's clearly written in the agreement

When typing the three words "make it with ai" in Baidu, there are several associative words that pop up: how to make short dramas with ai, do you make money with ai to make short dramas, and do you need money to make videos with ai?

When typing "How to AI", the first item is how to make Short Video, and the seventh item is how to make money by AI.

If you type "dream" and "workable", the second item is the same word:free version .

This is what most people really think about AI videos nowadays: Can they be made for free, and can they be used to make money?

The previous question is easy to answer, as each family has a free quota. On the latter question, I looked out and read the user agreements between these two companies, and found that they were different from what many people thought.

!

Curian: Not for commercial use without written permission

Keling's user agreement, this version will be released and effective on December 5, 2025. Original article 8.4.2:

You should not use the exported content as professional advice, for commercial purposes, or for other illegal purposes without our written permission.

In short,do not use it for commercial use without written permission.

This does not distinguish between whether you are a free user or a member.

What did the members buy with the money they paid? Looking at its pricing page, the two items "de-branding works" and "generated content can be commercially available" are both written in the member rights column. So the actual meaning is: opening a member is a way to obtain authorization. If you don't open a member, the agreement will be stuck there.

There is another sentence in Article 3.3.1:

You are not allowed to engage in commercial copying, distribution, sales or other commercial activities, such as software pre-installation and bundling.

The ## watermark is stricter than I thought

I originally thought that the watermark was just a technical problem. I'll put it in for you for free. If you want to remove it, you can pay for it, and if you can't get it, you can find a solution yourself.

After reading Article 10.5, I realized that this was not the case:

's right to remove brand watermarks from generated pictures, videos and other content is exclusive to members. If you are a non-member user or without our written consent, when you use this AI function to generate content through use, publication or dissemination, etc., you should mark the brand related to "Kellen AI" involved in this function on the content interface. Watermark

Note that the word used in the second half of the sentence is "should be marked on the content interface."

This is not "We mark you with a watermark, you can't remove it", but "You have an obligation to markit."

It means that even if you use some method to erase the watermark, you will still win the bid according to the agreement. This is an obligation, not a technical threshold.

!

is Dream: The ownership belongs to you, but you have to authorize it

That is, the dream side is different. Its user service agreement will be updated on August 25, 2025, and will take effect on September 1.

Article 9.2:

To the extent permitted by laws and regulations, the intellectual property rights of the input content, generated content and published information content of your use of DreamAI and other property rights and interests (if any) arising therefrom belong to you or the right holder who enjoys the intellectual property rights in accordance with the law.

The ownership belongs to you. There is also no clause in the agreement that separately prohibits commercial use like Kelvin 8.4.2.

But scroll down two items, 9.3 and 9.4:

You grant us a global, free, non-exclusive, multi-level sublicensable right to provide services to you under this agreement, optimize our products, services and models, and ensure the security and stability of services.

You grant us a global, free, non-exclusive, multi-level sublicensable right, including the rights to modify, reproduce, translate, assemble, disseminate information online, adapt and make derivatives, perform and display rights, etc.

The list of rights listed in article 2 is worth looking at one by one: modification, copying, translation, compilation, information network dissemination, adaptation, making derivatives, performance, and display.

What you make belongs to you, and the platform can be changed, passed on, and made into derivatives for free.

But there is also a corresponding one on the Ling side, 10.1.4:

We and our affiliated companies have the right to use the content you input, upload and generate using this service for free during the operation period and within the operation area... including but not limited to reproduction rights, adaptation rights, compilation rights, information network dissemination rights, making derivatives, etc.

This one is available in both families, and both are very wide. I guess this is something most people don't notice. If you generate things on the free platform, the platform doesn't have to ask you separately to use them.

!

The same one for both companies: AI logos cannot be deleted

Article 4.2 of the Dream:

We have the right to add logos in appropriate ways in accordance with the "Artificial Intelligence Generating Synthetic Content Identification Measures"; you are not allowed to block, smear, modify or delete the logos we add to AI content in any way.

Note that it quotes the "Artificial Intelligence Generating Synthetic Content Identification Method".

This shows thatthe source of AI identification is national regulations, not what the platform itself wants to add. Brand watermarks and AI logos are two different things: brand watermarks are the commercial rights of the platform and can be removed by members;AI logos are legal requirements and have nothing to do with whether you are a member.

These two are confused.

So I want to make money from AI videos, what is the actual situation

I used the free version of Keli to make a video. I wanted to take orders, bring goods, and put them into streaming, but the agreement couldn't get through. 8.4.2 is written very directly, commercial use requires written permission, and member rights include "generated content can be commercially available." If you want to make money in compliance with regulations, the way is to open a membership.

In terms of Dream, there is no separate commercial prohibition clause in the agreement, and the ownership also states that it belongs to you. Relatively loose. However, if you want to accept the two authorizations of 9.3 and 9.4, your things platform can be changed and transferred.

The AI logo cannot be deleted from the content of both companies. This article has nothing to do with members, it is at the legal level.

The agreement can change at any time. The version of Keling was released on December 5 last year, and the version of Dream came into effect on September 1 last year. If you really want to do a serious business project, don't believe me. Go and read the original agreement of the company you used that day. I have marked the terms and numbers, and they can read it quickly.

few sentences boundary

I only checked these two houses. I chose them because they rank first in search Lenovo, but it doesn't mean that other companies also write this way. I haven't checked other platforms.

What the agreement is written, how the platform actually implements it, and whether you can legally claim copyright are three different things. Writing in the agreement "The ownership belongs to you" does not mean that the law automatically recognizes that you have copyright. That depends on how originality is determined.

This article only talks about what the agreement writes. The specific amount of free credit provided by each family and the effect of the work are not included in this article.