I shook my head when I watched Xiaomi's model sale. A 50% price reduction will be effective permanently and is packaged as a technological breakthrough? Obviously, I am worried by open source models and vertical mini-models. In the financial report, the gross profit of mobile phones rose to 24%, but the net profit was only 6%. Now, the money earned from hardware is used to fill the bottomless pit of AI. A typical Internet approach-but the burning rate of large models is ten times that of the mobile Internet back then. Those entrepreneurs who fantasize about relying on MiMo to build a "one-person company" should wake up. The 30,000 bankruptcy cases in the WeChat hot article tell you that AI can generate PPT, but it cannot generate customer payments.
The fact that enterprise-level AI is stuck in the data quagmire is more fatal than imagined. The cases complained by four leaders in different industries are too typical: the bank reconciliation system cannot even unify the basic fields, the e-commerce risk control rules are all manually adjusted by old masters, and even breakpoints in the financial system have to be filled in manually. Put an LLM in at this time? It's like putting autopilot on a leaky boat. What's even more ironic is that the developer community is frantically creating the artifact of "knowledge mapping to understand code", and companies can't even gather structured data. The reality is that no matter how strong the Lance model, which ranks first in the HuggingFace trend list, is not enough to cure the company's 20-year-old Excel sheets.
The most alarming thing is that technical ethics debts begin to be settled. The three-body CEO poisoning case has exposed a shady story about equity disputes. The Netherlands directly confiscated 800 cybercrime servers, and California almost forced age verification for Linux-the knife of supervision is getting faster and faster. But the real depth bomb is Sutton's "Age of Experience": The father of intensive learning admitted that "current AI learning without physical feedback is lame walking." Looking at the biomedicine article, the technology of 3D printing intestinal organs to grow the nervous system on their own is ten times more important than the large model. After all, the AI that can repair the human body is just what it needs, rather than generating more little red book hit titles.
Entering AI now is like rushing into the Bitcoin mine in 2020: giants are fighting a price war to clear the situation, small and medium-sized enterprises are stuck in the pit of data infrastructure, and the regulatory sledgehammer will fall at any time. But from another perspective, the technology used in the Netherlands to copy servers, MIT's open source solution to print organs, and even the local methods of small companies to remove the "AI smell" are real-world engineering wisdom. Instead of chasing new model releases, it's better to see how Pang Donglai uses community trust to fight against Sam's algorithm-sometimes humanization is the ultimate technical barrier.