In today's technology circle, to put it bluntly, there are two words: burning money. And it's not a small fight, it's just pouring oil into the fire pit, hoping to burn the whole world.
Look at Anthropic, where the valuation has directly rushed to the trillion-dollar level, OpenAI has to be sidelined. Who is paying for this? Do investors have a lot of money in their hands, or do they think AI is the next money printer? Cursor, an AI programming company established only in 2022, was developed by four post-00s and directly received by Musk for US$60 billion. This is not entrepreneurship, it is clearly money collection. Smart Vision AI is even more ruthless. Not long after it went public, its share price increased eightfold. It directly spent 361 million yuan to buy a headquarters building in the core area of Beijing. These big model makers are now not only very skilled, but also confident in buying land, as if they want to become a new real estate tycoon. Musk is a money-mongering maniac. Not only does SpaceX's IPO, it will also invest US$119 billion to build a chip factory and launch 1 million AI satellites into space. This is not doing business, this is using capital to directly define the future. With so much money thrown in, I don't believe you say there is no bubble, but now anyone who dares to say bubble is a fool. This wave of AI arms race is no longer just about technology, but also about who can afford it and who can lay out the infrastructure deeper and wider.
Another interesting point is that the AI application layer, especially the concept of Agent, is now very popular. Once Claude's four-piece Agent set comes out, many startups will be unable to sleep. You think you built an App, only to find out that the Agent directly integrates your functions. Companies like CopilotKit directly allow you to "have an AI agent in your application without rewriting a line of code." This simply universalizes AI capabilities and allows Agents to be used like Lego bricks. A local life giant like Meituan couldn't help but set up an AI community to "find a tour" and 3000 Agents settled in. This is to use Agents to bring local services, social networking, and content to one go.
But don't just watch the fun, there are many pits here. Several popular projects on GitHub are studying how to make LLM behavior more reliable and how to avoid "AI slop". This shows that although the Agent may sound beautiful, when it is actually implemented, how to make it "not lose its intelligence" and how to make it "obedient" and how to integrate it into the production environment are all real engineering problems. A product like "KodHau" appears on Product Hunt, which specifically helps AI avoid screwing up the production environment. Therefore, the concept of Agent is very sexy, but there is still a long way to go before it can really work. When ordinary developers see these hot spots, don't rush to All in. First, find out what real pain points it can solve and how big engineering challenges it is. Don't be carried away by capital hype.